🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Conflict Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for using excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.